Open versus arthroscopic treatment of the rheumatoid elbow arthritis: a comparison of complications at two years utilizing a nationally representative database.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be addressed surgically with open procedures or elbow arthroscopy. Previous studies comparing outcomes of open to arthroscopic arthrolysis for the management of RA did not utilize a large database study. The aim was to compare demographics and two-year complications, in RA patients undergoing open or arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was performed utilizing a private, nationwide, all-payer database. We queried the database to identify patients undergoing open (n = 578) or arthroscopic (n = 379) arthrolysis for elbow RA. The primary goal of the study was to compare complications at two-years. Categorical variables were assessed utilizing the chi-squared test; while, continuous variables were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for infection following open or arthroscopic arthrolysis. RESULTS: RA patients undergoing open elbow arthrolysis were older (55 vs. 49 years, p < 0.001), predominately female (61.6% vs 60.9%, p = 0.895), and likely to have chronic kidney disease (20.4 vs. 12.9%), and DM (45.2 vs. 32.2%) (both p < 0.005). Open elbow arthrolysis was also associated with higher rates of infection (31.7 vs. 4.7%) and wound complications (26.8 vs. 3.4%) (both p = 0.001). Nerve injury rates were found to be similar (8.3 vs. 9.0%, p = 0.81). On multivariable logistic regression, open elbow procedures were associated with the highest risk for infection (OR: 8.43). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing open arthrolysis for RA were at a higher risk of infection and wound complications compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis utilizing a nationally representative database. While there appears to be a difference in outcomes following these two procedures, higher level evidence is needed to draw more definitive conclusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, Level III.

Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections Within 4 Weeks of Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures Are Associated With Increased Postoperative Infection Rates.

PURPOSE: To refine the understanding of the effect of timing of corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and shoulder arthroscopy on postoperative infection. METHODS: An insurance database was used to determine all patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for a 5-year period with an associated preoperative ipsilateral corticosteroid injection. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on timing of preoperative CSI: (1) 0-<2 weeks, (2) 2-<4 weeks, (3) 4-<6 weeks, and (4) 6-<8 weeks. Patients were pooled to include all patients who had a CSI less than 4 weeks and those longer than 4 weeks. A cohort of patients who never had a corticosteroid injection before undergoing arthroscopy were used as a control. All patients had a follow-up of 2 years. Multivariable regression analyses were performed using R Studio with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression showed a greater odds ratio (OR) for postoperative infection in patients who received CSI 0-<2 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy at 90 days (3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.57, P < .001), 1 year (2.51, 95% CI 1.46-4.12, P < .001), and 2 years (2.08, 95% CI 1.27-3.28, P = .002) compared with the control group. Patients who received CSI 2-<4 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy had greater OR for infection at 90 days (2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.83, P = .03), 1 year (1.82, 95% CI 1.13-2,82, P = .01), and 2 years (1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.47, P = .012). Patients who received CSI after 4 weeks had similar ORs of infection at 90 days (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.78-1.69, P = .48) 1 year (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.85-1.63 P = .33), and 2 years (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.42, P = .54), compared with the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows the postoperative infection risk is greatest when CSIs are given within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy, whereas CSIs given within 2-<4 weeks also portend increased risk, albeit to a lesser degree. The risk of postoperative infection is not significantly increased when CSIs are given more than 1 month before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative, prognosis study.

Arthroplasty-Related Pseudotumor of the Scapula: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Arthroplasty-related pseudotumors are nonneoplastic and noninfectious inflammatory masses that are typically associated with adverse reaction to metal debris. Pseudotumors most commonly occur in the setting of metal-on-metal joint replacements at the hip. However, the presentation of pseudotumor at the shoulder is exceedingly rare. In this article, we reported a case of arthroplasty-related pseudotumor of the scapula. Clinical history, radiologic signs, and tissue analysis are described. Knowledge of this rare diagnosis will support clinical decision making for teams of radiologists, pathologists, oncologists, and orthopaedic surgeons who provide care for patients presenting with suspicious shoulder masses.

Curtailing infection risks in hepatitis C patients: the effect of antiviral treatment in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision shoulder arthroplasty (RevSA) is a complex procedure that can result in various postoperative complications. However, the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) on postoperative complications after RevSA remains unclear because of limited and inconsistent evidence. This study aims (1) to investigate the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with HCV undergoing RevSA and (2) to evaluate the impact of HCV treatment on complication rates at different time points after the revision procedure, specifically at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database to investigate recent trends in the use of RevSA among HCV patients to assess postoperative complication rates, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), wound complication, transfusion, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Statistical analyses involved propensity score matching to create balanced cohorts and logistic regression to determine the relative risk of postoperative complications. Data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 24.0 for Windows). The study included patients who underwent partial or total RevSA procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Patients were identified based on medical claims that included procedural codes for RevSA and associated diagnosis codes for PJI or insertion/removal of an antibiotic spacer. A Bonferroni correction was used because many tests were performed and statistical significance was set at P = .0125. RESULTS: The HCV cohort demonstrated higher PJI rates at 1-year (5.5% vs. 3.9%, P = .006) and 2-year follow-ups (6.7% vs. 4.6%, P = .006). However, no significant differences emerged in VTE and wound complication rates between the HCV and non-HCV cohorts. Comparing untreated and treated HCV patients, the former showed significantly higher PJI rates at 2 years (P = .010), whereas the treated group had significantly lower odds ratios for PJI. When comparing treated HCV patients with the non-HCV cohort, minimal differences were found in postoperative outcomes, indicating no significant difference in the risk of complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our study observed an association between HCV patients who received antiviral treatment prior to RevSA and a reduced incidence of PJI compared to untreated HCV patients. When comparing this group to the non-HCV controls, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI, suggesting a potential association between antiviral treatment and the observed risk patterns in HCV patients. Proper management of HCV-positive patients during RevSA is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing complications.

Open versus arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis for primary osteoarthritis: A comparison of demographics and complications at two years.

Introduction: Open techniques have traditionally been utilized in the surgical management of elbow osteoarthritis (OA). However, advances in elbow arthroscopy, in conjunction with the movement towards minimally invasive surgery, have led to an increase in the utilization of an arthroscopic approach. The primary aim of this investigation was to compare demographics and complication rates between patients undergoing open or arthroscopic arthrolysis for elbow OA with a secondary objective of identifying risk factors for infection with each treatment. Methods: A retrospective review of a private, all-payer database was performed to identify patients undergoing either open (n = 1482) or arthroscopic (n = 2341) arthrolysis for elbow osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was 2-year complications, which included infection, wound complications, and nerve injuries. Categorical variables were compared utilizing chi-square analyses, while continuous variables were compared using independent sample t-tests. Odd ratios (OR) were ascertained to quantify the risk attributed to open arthrolysis compared to arthroscopic. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for infection following open or arthroscopic arthrolysis of an elbow with OA. Results: Age was significantly higher in the open cohort (55 ± 13.4 years) compared to the arthroscopic cohort (52 ± 13.1 years) (p < 0.001). The open cohort was more likely to be female (32.0 vs. 22.9%, p < 0.001) and have a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) greater than three (9.2 vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001). Open procedures were associated with an increased risk of nerve injury (OR: 1.50) and wound complications (OR: 7.70) compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis. Multivariable logistic regression identified open procedures as a risk factor for infection (OR: 11.15). Moreover, diabetes (OR: 1.48), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.89) and tobacco use (OR: 2.29) were found as risk factors for infection among the open cohort. Conclusions: This study found patients undergoing open arthrolysis of OA to be older and have a greater number of medical comorbidities compared to those undergoing arthroscopic arthrolysis. Open arthrolysis was associated with an increased rate of infection, nerve injury and wound complications compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis. After controlling for age and comorbidities with multivariable logistic regression, open arthrolysis remained a risk factor for infection. Arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis is associated with a lower risk of complications, including infection and may be favored for the management of OA of the elbow. Level of Evidence: III (retrospective cohort study).

Does timing matter? The effect of preoperative smoking cessation on the risk of infection or revision following rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Nicotine in tobacco products is known to impair bone and tendon healing, and smoking has been associated with an increased rate of retear and reoperation following rotator cuff repair (RCR). Although smoking is known to increase the risk of failure following RCR, former smoking status and the timing of preoperative smoking cessation have not previously been investigated. METHODS: A national all-payer database was queried for patients undergoing RCR between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive groups according to smoking history: (1) never smokers (n = 50,000), (2) current smokers (n = 28,291), (3) former smokers with smoking cessation 3-6 months preoperatively (n = 34,513), (4) former smokers with smoking cessation 6-12 months preoperatively (n = 786), and (5) former smokers with smoking cessation >12 months preoperatively (n = 1399). The risks of postoperative infection and revision surgery were assessed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years following surgery. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to isolate and evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS: The 90-day rate of infection following RCR was 0.28% in never smokers compared with 0.51% in current smokers and 0.52% in former smokers who quit smoking 3-6 months prior to surgery (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression identified smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; P < .001) and smoking cessation 3-6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.56; P < .001) as risk factors for 90-day infection. The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. However, smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a significant elevation in infection risk. In addition, smoking was associated with an elevated 90-day revision risk (OR, 1.22; P = .038), as was smoking cessation between 3 and 6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.19; P = .048). The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a statistically significant elevation in revision risk. CONCLUSION: Current smokers and former smokers who quit smoking within 6 months of RCR are at an elevated risk of postoperative infection and revision surgery at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively compared with never smokers. Former smokers who quit >6 months prior to RCR are not at a detectably elevated risk of infection or revision surgery compared with those who have never smoked.

Acromion morphology is associated with glenoid bone loss in posterior glenohumeral instability.

BACKGROUND: The acromion morphology in a shoulder with posterior instability differs from that of a shoulder without glenohumeral instability. Specifically, the acromion with a flatter sagittal tilt, greater posterior acromial height, and less posterior coverage is associated with posterior instability. However, the association between acromion morphology and glenoid bone loss (GBL) in the setting of posterior glenohumeral instability has not previously been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether acromial morphology influences the extent or pattern of posterior GBL in a cohort of patients with posterior glenohumeral instability. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study identified 89 shoulders with unidirectional posterior glenohumeral instability. Total area GBL was measured using the best-fit circle method on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Shoulders were divided into 3 groups: (1) no GBL (n = 30), (2) GBL 0%-13.5% (n = 45), or (3) GBL ≥13.5% (n = 14). Acromion measurements were performed on MRI and included acromial tilt, posterior acromial height, anterior acromial coverage, and posterior acromial coverage. RESULTS: Patients without GBL had a steeper acromial tilt (58.5° ± 1.4°) compared with those with 0%-13.5% GBL (64.3° ± 1.5°) or GBL ≥13.5% (67.7° ± 1.8°) (P = .004). Patients without GBL also had greater posterior coverage (65.4° ± 1.7°) compared with those with GBL (60.3° ± 1.4°) (P = .015). Posterior acromion height was not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that an acromion with a flatter sagittal tilt and less posterior coverage is associated with GBL in the setting of posterior glenohumeral instability. This is important to consider as posterior GBL has been identified as a risk factor for failure of posterior soft tissue-stabilizing procedures.

Glenoid Bone Loss Pattern in Patients With Posterior Instability Versus Anterior Instability: A Matched Cohort Study.

Background: The pattern of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in anterior glenohumeral instability is well described. It was recognized recently that posterior GBL after instability has a posteroinferior pattern. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare GBL patterns in a matched cohort of patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. The hypothesis was that the GBL pattern in posterior instability would be more inferior than the GBL pattern in anterior instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 28 patients with posterior instability were matched with 28 patients with anterior instability by age, sex and number of instability events. GBL location was defined using a clockface model. Obliquity was defined as the angle between the long axis of the glenoid and a line tangent to the GBL. Superior and inferior GBL were measured as areas and defined relative to the equator. The primary outcome was the 2-dimensional characterization of posterior versus anterior GBL. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the posterior GBL patterns in traumatic and atraumatic instability mechanisms in an expanded cohort of 42 patients. Results: The mean age of the matched cohorts (n = 56) was 25.2 ± 9.87 years. The median obliquity of GBL was 27.53° (interquartile range [IQR], 18.83°-47.38°) in the posterior cohort and 9.28° (IQR, 6.68°-15.75°) in the anterior cohort (P < .001). The mean superior-to-inferior bone loss ratio was 0.48 ± 0.51 in the posterior cohort and 0.80 ± 0.55 (P = .032) in the anterior cohort. In the expanded posterior instability cohort (n = 42), patients with traumatic injury mechanism (n = 22), had a similar GBL obliquity compared to patients with an atraumatic injury mechanism (n = 20) (mean, 27.73° [95% CI, 20.26°-35.20°] vs 32.20° [95% CI, 21.27°-43.14°], respectively) (P = .49). Conclusion: Posterior GBL occurred more inferiorly and at an increased obliquity compared with anterior GBL. This pattern is consistent for traumatic and atraumatic posterior GBL. Bone loss along the equator may not be the most reliable predictor of posterior instability, and critical bone loss may be reached more rapidly than a model of loss along the equator may predict.

Increased actual sling wear is associated with better early patient-reported and image-based outcomes after shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have failed to show differences in functional outcomes for patient-reported sling use after rotator cuff repair. Temperature-sensing devices are used to more accurately measure brace adherence. The purposes of this study were to quantify actual sling adherence and its predictors and to establish whether increased sling adherence is associated with improved functional and image-based outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 65 patients undergoing shoulder surgery requiring ≥4 weeks of postoperative sling use. Temperature-sensing devices were implanted in the slings to monitor sling adherence. Patient-reported sling adherence was determined from a questionnaire. Patients were considered 80% adherent if they wore the sling 16 h/d (112 h/week) when 20 h/d was prescribed. The primary outcomes were patient-reported and actual sling adherence, patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and visual analog scale pain score) within 12 months postoperatively, and image-based failure based on ultrasound or radiography at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient-reported sling adherence was highly sensitive (82.8%), was poorly specific (28.6%), had low accuracy (53.1%), and was weakly correlated with actual sling adherence (r = 0.32, P = .009). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, male patients were 91% less likely than female patients to be adherent with sling use (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.42; P = .002). Additionally, obese and morbidly obese patients were 88% (95% CI, 0.02-0.84; P = .033) and 98% (95% CI, 0.002-0.27; P = .003), respectively, less likely than non-obese patients to adhere to sling wear postoperatively. After we controlled for surgical procedure, visual analog scale pain scores were significantly better at 6 weeks (ß = -1.47; 95% CI, -2.88 to -0.05; P = .04) and 3 months (ß = -1.68; 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.08; P = .04) if patients adhered to sling wear. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that 13.6 hours and 15.4 hours of daily sling wear optimized image-based outcomes at 6 weeks (failure rate, 0% vs. 16%; P = .01) and 1 year (failure rate, 3% vs. 28%; P = .008) postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that patient-reported sling adherence is unreliable, adherence can be predicted by female sex and lower body mass index, and increased sling adherence is associated with improved early pain scores and image-based outcomes. These data can help inform future studies using postoperative sling protocols as patient-reported sling adherence is not an accurate method to assess sling use.

Coronal Plane Articular Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus.

Coronal plane articular shear fractures of the distal humerus are a rare injury, comprising 6% of distal humerus fractures. The fracture can be easily missed on initial radiographs; therefore, a high index of suspicion is warranted. Radiographically obvious fractures are often more complex than initially appreciated, with plain radiographs often underestimating the extent of posterior comminution and trochlear involvement. Associated bony and ligamentous injuries are common. Anatomic reduction and internal fixation of displaced fractures is the standard of care because poor results have been described with nonsurgical treatment. However, the regional anatomy and the often-limited bone stock can make open reduction and internal fixation challenging. The lateral approach, with headless compression screws placed from anterior to posterior, is commonly used for simpler fracture patterns, but exposure and fixation of trochlea extension can be difficult. In the absence of posterior comminution, the anterolateral approach can enhance trochlea exposure and allow for a better trajectory for screw placement. Posterior comminution often requires locking plate fixation. Better results and lower complication rates have been reported for fractures with less fragmentation of the articular surface and those without posterior comminution. Contracture and symptomatic implants are the most common reasons for revision surgery.

Does needle penetration of the shoulder joint prior to arthroscopy increase infection risk? The effect of preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram or corticosteroid injection.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has associated preoperative corticosteroid shoulder injection (CSI) with infection following shoulder surgery. A recent study found an equally elevated risk of total knee arthroplasty infection with preoperative injection of either CSI or hyaluronic acid. The implication is that violation of a joint prior to surgery, even in the absence of corticosteroid, may pose an elevated risk of infection following orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether violation of the shoulder joint for magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) poses an elevated risk of infection following shoulder arthroscopy, and to compare this risk to that introduced by preoperative CSI. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy between January 2015 and October 2020. Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) no CSI or MRA within 6 months of surgery (n = 5000), (2) CSI within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 1055), (3) CSI between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 2575), (4) MRA within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 414), and (5) MRA between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 1138). Postoperative infection (septic shoulder or surgical site infection) was analyzed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years, postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlled for differences among groups. RESULTS: MRA within 2 weeks prior to shoulder surgery was associated with an increased risk of infection at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; P = .007), while MRA 2-4 weeks preceding surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at any time point. By comparison, CSI within 2 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.72; P = .022), 1 year (OR, 1.65; P = .005), and 2 years (OR, 1.63; P = .002) following surgery. Similarly, CSI 2-4 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.83; P < .001), 1 year (OR, 1.62; P < .001), and 2 years (OR, 1.79; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CSI within 4 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy elevates the risk of postoperative infection. Needle arthrotomy for shoulder MRA elevates the risk of infection in a more limited fashion. Avoidance of MRA within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy may mitigate postoperative infection risk. Additionally, the association between preoperative CSI and postoperative infection may be more attributed to medication profile than to needle arthrotomy.

The Effect of Patients' Understanding of Sling Necessity and Home Assistance on Sling Wear After Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative education and socioeconomic factors influence patient behavior. Recent evidence has suggested that sling compliance is associated with improved outcomes after shoulder surgery; it is important to investigate factors that influence sling compliance. PURPOSE: To determine the associations between postoperative sling wear and patients' understanding of sling necessity, postoperative home assistance, and social deprivation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 66 patients were prospectively enrolled from 2018 to 2020 if they were ≥18 years of age and undergoing shoulder surgery requiring a sling for at least 1 month postoperatively. Sling wear was measured using a temperature-sensing device. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients' understanding for sling necessity was determined by their response to a question on the Medical Adherence Measure questionnaire, "Why did you have to wear a shoulder sling?" The Patient Understanding Grading Scale (PUGS) was developed to quantify patient responses. PUGS was graded 1 to 3, with grade 1 corresponding to the least technical knowledge. Patient characteristics, social deprivation (Area Deprivation Index [ADI]), and home assistance were additionally analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients when stratified by PUGS grade. Multivariable linear regression analysis for total hours of sling wear per week showed that patients with PUGS grade 2 (ß, 48.2 hours; P = .007) and grade 3 (ß, 59.5 hours; P = .003) wore their slings significantly more than grade 1 patients. Patients with home assistance had significantly greater day hours (73.5 ± 33.0 vs 44.0 ± 24.5 hours; P = .037) of sling wear per week, but there was no difference in night sling hours. Patients older than 60 years wore their slings significantly more, while men and those with a higher body mass index (BMI) wore their slings significantly less. ADI was not significantly associated with sling wear. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with greater understanding for sling necessity, those with home assistance, and patients >60 years have greater sling wear, while male patients and those with a higher BMI have lower sling compliance. ADI was not a significant contributor.

Higher preoperative expectations predict better outcomes in shoulder surgery patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative expectations (PE) are an independent predictor of greater 2-year outcomes and greater improvement from baseline in shoulder surgery patients. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixteen patients who underwent shoulder surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed both preoperative and 2-year follow-up questionnaires including PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) computer-adaptive testing in six domains, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, shoulder numeric pain scale (NPS), and the Marx Shoulder Activity Rating Scale (MARS). PE were measured using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes and Data Evaluation Management System (MODEMS) expectations domain, and satisfaction was measured via the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8). RESULTS: The mean PE score was 86.2 ± 17.8. Greater PE were associated with significantly better 2-year scores for ASES, NPS, MARS, SSQ8, and PROMIS domains of Physical Function, Fatigue, Pain Interference Fatigue and Social Satisfaction. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that greater PE were an independent predictor of both better 2-year scores and greater improvement for PROMIS SS (p < 0.001), ASES (p = 0.007), and shoulder NPS (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Greater PE are positively associated with numerous patient-based outcomes 2 years after surgery. With regards to pain relief, shoulder function, and social satisfaction, higher PE are also predictive of better outcome scores and more improvement. This study suggests that preoperative assessment of shoulder surgery PE is important, and that counseling patients to optimize realistic expectations may lead to superior outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Are outcomes after fixation of distal humerus coronal shear fractures affected by surgical approach? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Surgical management of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus is associated with a high rate of complications. Several surgical approaches have been described to address these fractures. The complication profiles associated with each approach have not previously been compared, and that is the aim of the present study. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all studies addressing coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus published between 2001 and January 2022. Of the 189 articles identified, 45 met the criteria for inclusion. Summaries of continuous data were calculated using the inverse variance method for pooling with random effects models. Fixed effects model estimates were reported unless significant heterogeneity was observed between studies. A subset of 6 studies reported the surgical approach and complications associated with the operative management of capitellar shear fractures without posterior comminution. The complication profiles of the extended lateral and anterolateral approaches were compared. Results: The 45 studies included yielded 899 patients. The average age was 44.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.7 to 50.2). The fracture type was Dubberley A in 38% (n = 342), Dubberley B in 33% (n = 300), and not reported in the remainder. The reoperation rate was 13.8% (95% CI: 9.6% to 19.5%). Pooled complication rates included post-traumatic arthritis in 21.2% (95% CI: 18.0% to 24.9%), heterotopic ossification in 12.0% (95% CI: 9.2% to 15.6%), nerve injury in 7.8% (95% CI: 5.6% to 10.9%), and avascular necrosis in 7.4% (95% CI: 5.3% to 10.2%). The complication rate in noncomparative studies was 25.8% following the lateral approach and 16.7% following the anterolateral approach. Reported complications following the anterolateral approach were pain (9.5%) and nerve injury (7.1%). Reported complications following the lateral approach included arthritis (9.1%), heterotopic ossification (6.1%), avascular necrosis (4.5%), instability (3.0%), nerve injury (1.5%), and wound issues (1.5%). Discussion and Conclusion: Complications are common following operative management of capitellar shear fractures. In noncomparative studies, the complication rate was higher following the extended lateral compared to the anterolateral approach for Dubberley A fractures. Additionally, the reported complications following the extended lateral approach may impact long-term outcomes. Insufficient comparative evidence currently exists to recommend one approach over the other. High-quality comparative studies are needed.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a novel subscapularis outcome score: the Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score.

Background: Available surveys that evaluate shoulder strength and pain often combine rotator cuff muscles making the test unable to differentiate subscapularis tears from other pathology including concomitant supraspinatus, infraspinatus tears. The purpose of this study was to validate a subscapularis-specific shoulder survey (Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score) as a viable clinical outcome assessment through analysis of psychometric properties. Methods: A 5-question survey was given to a study population of 390 patients, 136 of whom had full thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum score of 5 (better) and a maximum score of 25 (worse). Surveys were given during the initial consultation, preoperative visit, and postoperative visit. Content validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness to change, internal consistency, and minimal clinically important difference using distribution and anchor-based methods were determined for our subscapularis function survey. Results: A high correlation was reported on test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89). An acceptable internal consistency was reported for all patients surveyed (Cronbach alpha = 0.91). Floor and ceiling effects for patients with rotator cuff pathology were minimized (1% for both). Patients with an isolated subscapularis tear scored worse than supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears and exhibited similar dysfunction as patients with a supraspinatus/infraspinatus/subscapularis tear. An acceptable construct validity was reported with subscapularis-involved tears demonstrating higher scores with significance (P < .05). There was excellent responsiveness to change with a standardized response mean of 1.51 and effect size of 1.27 (large > 0.8). The minimal clinically important difference using a distribution and anchor-based method was 4.1 and 4.6, respectively. Among patients with rotator cuff tears in this population, a score of 22 or higher predicts a subscapularis tear 75% of the time, in spite of its low overall prevalence. Conclusion: The subscapularis shoulder score demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance for outcomes assessment in patients with rotator cuff disease. This survey can be used as an effective clinical tool to assess subscapularis function.

Preoperative factors associated with patient satisfaction 2 years after elective shoulder surgery.

Background Purpose: Patient satisfaction has become an increasingly important component of quality measures for both hospital reimbursement and quality assessment. Additionally, patient satisfaction influences patient behavior and patient follow-up. The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with patient satisfaction 2 years after shoulder surgery. Methods: Electronic surveys were used to collect patient information including demographic, surgical, and social history, as well as outcome data. Satisfaction was measured 2 years after surgery using the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire. Results: Multivariable linear regression identified preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference, annual income, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score as independent predictors of lower patient satisfaction, while total shoulder arthroplasty was an independent predictor of greater patient satisfaction. The model accounted for 15% of the variance in satisfaction scores (R2 = 0.15). Conclusion: Patient satisfaction 2 years after shoulder surgery is associated with preoperative patient-reported outcome scores. Lower patient satisfaction is independently predicted by greater preoperative PROMIS PI, income less than $70,000, and ASA score >1, while higher patient satisfaction is predicted by total shoulder arthroplasty.

PROMIS Depression and Anxiety in shoulder surgery patients.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms in patients undergoing shoulder surgery using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression and Anxiety computer adaptive tests, and to determine the factors associated with more severe symptoms. Additionally, we sought to determine whether PROMIS Depression and Anxiety were associated with functional outcomes after shoulder surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 293 patients from an urban population who underwent elective shoulder surgery from 2015 to 2018. Survey questionnaires included preoperative and two-year postoperative data. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations and multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Mean two-year PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores significantly improved from preoperative scores, with a greater improvement observed in PROMIS Anxiety. Worse PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores were also significantly correlated with worse PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (ASES). After controlling for confounding variables, worse PROMIS Depression was an independent predictor of worse PROMIS PF, while worse PROMIS Anxiety was an independent predictor of worse PROMIS PF and ASES scores. CONCLUSION: Mean two-year PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores improved after elective shoulder surgery and several patient characteristics were associated with these scores. Worse functional outcomes were associated with worse PROMIS Depression and Anxiety; however, more severe two-year PROMIS Anxiety was the strongest predictor of worse functional outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):479-485.

Preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are commonly used to manage pain from acute injury or chronic degenerative diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder surgery and the clinical factors associated with preoperative opioid use. METHODS: This was an analytical cross-sectional study of 175 patients undergoing shoulder surgery at an urban hospital from June 2015 to June 2017. Multivariable regression models were used to determine independent associations. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients reported preoperative opioid use, which was significantly associated with primary procedure performed (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]), higher body mass index (BMI), unemployment, lower income, smoking, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, greater number of previous surgeries, higher comorbidity burden, and decreased expectations to exercise and do recreational activities (p < 0.05). Preoperative opioid use was independently associated with worse scores on the: Numeric Pain Scale, ASES, IPAQ, and PROMIS domains of Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Social Satisfaction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: More than one in four patients reported preoperative opioid use. Several health measures, including worse pain, function, and social satisfaction were independently associated with preoperative opioid use. These findings suggest that orthopaedic surgeons need to identify patients using opioids preoperatively in order to effectively establish and execute a plan for pain management, which may include weaning off opioids prior to surgery, managing psychological distress, and optimizing coping strategies.Level of Evidence: III.

Preoperative characteristics predictive of PROMIS Pain Interference two years after shoulder surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to identify preoperative characteristics associated with worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) two years after shoulder surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 293 patients who underwent elective shoulder surgery. Survey questionnaires were collected within one week of surgery and then two years postoperatively. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations and multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Worse two-year PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with older age, higher BMI, greater comorbidities, more prior surgeries, and multiple socio-demographic factors. Less improvement in PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with greater comorbidities, more previous surgeries, unemployment, prior orthopaedic surgery on the operative joint, and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Better scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with better two-year PROMIS PI. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that worse two-year PROMIS PI was independently predicted by the following preoperative factors: Workers' Compensation claim, opioid use, worse whole body Numeric Pain Score, and worse PROMIS PI. Less improvement in two-year PROMIS PI was predicted by the same preoperative factors. CONCLUSION: Worse PROMIS PI after shoulder surgery was associated with older age, greater comorbidities, mental health impairment, and lower socioeconomic status. Preoperative predictors of worse pain interference two years after shoulder surgery included Workers' Compensation, opioid use, worse whole body pain, and worse PROMIS PI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.